Friday, August 1, 2014

THE SHOW MUST GO ON



Dave Schwensen, a comedy club manager and author of the excellent guide for aspiring comics, "The Comedy Book," posted this on Face Book on the page, “Detroit Comedians and Comedy Fans.”

Have you ever missed a gig? Being a no-show is worse than ignoring the light while on stage and going over your performance time. http://thecomedybook.wordpress.com/2014/07/22/youll-never-work-in-this-town-again/
“Don’t miss a gig if you plan to work for that talent booker again in the future. And if you do, just hope he sees you on the television news explaining how the tornado interrupted your rendezvous w...

As a professional actor and sometime professional comic, I'd like to add my voice to the discussion.

Missing an open mic is okay, although if I have a spot I will, if at all possible, notify the host or show runner as far in advance as possible. But missing a booked gig short of actual impossibility caused by serious illness or injury or the equivalent is very bad form. In forty years of amateur and professional acting and fifteen of (mostly amateur) comedy, I've never missed a performance (except a few open mics - with notice) even for illness or injury. I’ve had to rent cars to get to comedy performances at least twice.

In my late fifties, I performed in “Summer and Smoke” with a 102+ fever, chills, and cold sweats, and was as energetic as ever, until my exit, when I strode to the wings and stumbled to the dressing room. When it came time for curtain call I kept time with the other actors marching downstage.

About thirty years ago I was to open in a dinner theater production of "The Odd Couple" as Oscar Madison on Thursday. On the previous Monday I'd twisted my ankle playing basketball, it swelled up big and quick and I could barely limp. Offstage I used a cane and hobbled. I rehearsed sitting in the couch. Another aggravating factor was a jury trial in Port Huron, about two hours from the show that started on Tuesday. I drove to Port Huron every morning and tried the case to a jury. At 5:00 when Court adjourned for the day, I drove back, arriving at the theater about 7:45, bought a couple of snickers bars and a large coffee, changed into costume, got made up, did all the performances and had a great time.

Before opening night, I’d cut my costume shoe open so I could wrap my ankle with an Ace bandage and I moved as naturally as I could. I bounced around the stage with all necessary energy got all the laughs that Oscar Madison should get. I don’t think anyone in the audience had even a notion about my bad ankle, although it hurt like hell.

The show ran three or four weeks, and the ankle improved a little each day, walking with the cane, the pain slowly receding, but it was months before the swelling went all the way down and I was able to return to basketball.  There really is something to the theater motto, "The show must go on." In theaters with understudies, like the Purple Rose, it's not quite as compelling, but still actors don't like to take the chance for an injury or sick day off. In "Escanaba in Love," after it moved from the Purple Rose to the Gem in Detroit, the actor I was understudying, Will David Young, badly injured his knee on the day of opening night, but went on anyhow, sitting in a chair with his leg in a cast. Finally, he had to take off for surgery and came back only three weeks later, not fully healed, but impelled by his sense of responsibility. That really applies to almost all jobs, professional and otherwise. It’s taking an adult approach to your work.

Missing a performance when not absolutely, positively, necessary is not professional.

By the way, Dave Schwensen’s book is a valuable aide to comics, and it appears to be free.

Saturday, February 15, 2014

JERSEY BULLIES: Christie and Incognito?





In a 144 page investigative report to the NFL based on emails, text messages, and over 100 interviews, Richie Incognito was blamed for an atmosphere of intimidation in the Miami Dolphins locker room that used racial and sexual taunts and “joking” threats in “a classic case of bullying, directed against Jonathan Martin, who is both black and gay, and who finally quit the team after contemplating suicide.

The report, however, did not point to the similarities in behavior between Incognito and his fellow New Jersey native, Governor Chris Christie. This writer suggests that the full story of these two men be told in a documentary to be called, “The Bloated Bully Brothers, starring Jake and Elwood Bully.” An observer noted that, beside their similar appearances and body types, the Bully Brothers both wear their names on their clothing, Christie on the front, and Incognito on the back. Incognito’s has a number, and Christie’s has his title.

Sunday, January 26, 2014

NEWS BURIED ON JUMP PAGE. READER’S DILEMMA: TO JUMP OR NOT TO JUMP




In Ann Arbor today, as on most days since late December, the snow that dominates the view from our kitchen window and the well-below freezing temperatures that go with it are the most important topics of the day. As I have almost every morning for more years than I care to admit, I unfold my reading rack and place the first section of the Times on it. But as I drizzle honey on my granola and prepare to pour my first cup of coffee, I see this troubling headline on the front page, “Accidents Surge As Oil Industry Takes the Train.” I want to know more so I read down to the bottom and learn about breakfast at Kerry’s Kitchen in a small town in North Dakota where comfort food, especially freshly baked caramel rolls, is the order of the day. 

I took a large spoonful of cereal, topped with fresh fruit and raisins and sipped some coffee. Then, I learned that the trains the headline alluded to rumble by the diner’s window seven times a day, and that sometime last month one of them had a fiery accident that caused evacuation of the town. That’s what I learned by reading a little over three and a half column inches. Naturally, my curiosity was whetted, but I couldn’t learn more without removing the paper from the rack, unfolding it (I can’t believe the Times doesn’t know what its readers are acutely aware of, that turning pages of the Times requires care and skills best developed on the subway, as it wends its way through the tunnels and bridges that take one from an apartment in Brooklyn to lower Manhattan, something I did over fifty years ago).

I took another sip of coffee to wash down the bits of flax seed that had begun to cover my teeth so I could turn to the jump page and follow the story.

On page 18, I find the history of the practice that led to the accidents alluded to by the headline, and finally get the actual facts after I have made it through another 2 ½ column inches.

I decided to make a complaint, so I told my girlfriend, to whom I do most of my whining, and she told me of the Public Editor’s piece in today’s Week in Review, for which I thank you. But this particular story is polluted not only by interpretation, but by irrelevant “human interest” details that keep me from what once might have been called “news.”

The effort involved in turning pages of the Times is considerable and the possibility that it will be fruitful can’t be estimated until you’ve actually done it. This is not fair to print edition readers. At Erasmus Hall High School I took two terms of journalism from Erna Fleischer, and learned the inverted pyramid system of writing news stories and the reasons for it. It seems to me that the print edition of a broad-sheet newspaper should, for the most part, follow that plan.

Perhaps you think that readers don’t need details because they get them from TV, radio and internet, but that doesn’t apply to me. If it did, I might cancel my subscription to the hard copy paper and save myself over $600.00 per year because it would render your paper irrelevant.

I hope your column today bears fruit so that I can continue to look to the Times as my primary news source.

Monday, October 28, 2013

GUEST BLOGGER: A Letter Sent To Our Representatives and Senators By My Girlfriend

Please do everything in your power to defeat the King amendment to the Farm Bill. This amendment is an attack on democracy and threatens to undermine Americans' confidence in their ability to have any meaningful input on the laws under which they live. As just one example, in 2008, according to Wikipedia, more than 8 million Californians (63% of voters) approved Proposition 2, which confers some meager protections on farm animals. By contrast, there are only some 3 million people in Iowa, of whom only 200,000 (53%) voted for Mr. King. And he has the power to set farm policy for the United States? By attaching an odious amendment to must-pass legislation, Mr. King seeks to get by trickery what he could never achieve by legitimate means. It is as much to keep the faith with American voters as to protect farm animals that we must defeat Mr. King's noxious, antidemocratic amendment. Better no farm bill at all than one that spits in the face of the people of California and other states and rewards the bullying tactics of a single, out-of-step individual.

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

MR. BOEHNER, CALL A HALT TO THE COUP D'ETAT

If you haven’t already, you must hear this excerpt from an actual House of Representatives proceeding, because all Americans need to know how far the House has gone to constrict the life breath of our democracy. As you hear it, note the smugness of the speaker pro-tem chairing the session as he rebuffs the arguments of a representative who wants to bring to the floor for a vote an amendment proposed by the Senate to end the shut down and debt payment crisis we now face.



A coup d'état  . . . is the sudden deposition of a government, usually by a small group of the existing state establishment—typically the military—to depose the extant government and replace it with another body, civil or military. A coup d'état is considered successful when the usurpers establish their dominance. When the coup neither fails completely nor succeeds, a civil war is a likely consequence.
A coup d'état typically uses the extant government's power to assume political control of the country. In Coup d’état: A Practical Handbook, military historian Edward Luttwak states that "[a] coup consists of the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder." The armed forces, whether military or paramilitary, are not a defining factor of a coup d'état . . .
The House of Representatives has amended its standing rule so that only the speaker or his delegate could call for a vote on an amendment made by the Senate, effectively putting in the hands of one man, John Boehner, the ability to call a house vote on a sensible and necessary plan to permit the government to function, with no recourse to the full House, and to make timely payments of debt service This is the latest step of a coup d’etat designed to concentrate power in the hands of the Tea Party rump. It’s clear that the change to the long-standing and sensibly-democratic House rule  was adopted simply to prevent a vote that the Tea Party rump would probably lose.

Earlier steps include use at record levels of frequency of procedures in the Senate to prevent bills and appointments that the Democratic majority would pass ; court decisions that permit unlimited and often anonymous campaign donations; radically gerrymandered House districts, proposals to have presidential electors chosen by congressional districts instead of statewide. Some call the Tea Party crazy, but these small steps are beginning to form a pattern of concentrating power in a minority of Republicans.

A small group of government insiders using the power of the government to take over functions constitutionally assigned to both Houses of Congress and the President is  happening and it closely tracks the definition of coup d'état. And now it has come to this: a small rump of Congress has amassed the power to prevent the U.S. government from functioning according to our constitution and laws.
I offer no solutions, but we must prevent the democracy hating rump of Congress from taking over the government for its own purposes. Add to court decisions that, the absolute refusal of a minority of the House of Representatives to permit the nation to function according to its constitution and laws, and there is real danger present. The Tea Party rump is drawing about itself, in small steps, a wall of undemocratic actions to preserve and extend its power over the majority made up of Republicans and
Democrats. I offer no solutions except to exhort the sane members of both parties to put a stop to the power-hungry rump’s ongoing coup.

Many have called the Tea Party faction crazy, but they begin to seem diabolically clever. They’re on the verge of causing untold damage to this Country’s finances for a long time to come, of severely reducing our reputation as the leader of the “free world;” of depriving Americans of lawful benefits; and repealing the democratically elected and Supreme Court approved Affordable Health Care act by simply withholding the funds necessary to implement it.

President Obama and the Democrats are doing the right thing by not yielding to the demands of bullies but, oddly enough, only John Boehner can call a halt to this passive violence by calling for a vote in the House. He hasn’t so far been a profile in courage but we can only hope.

Sunday, October 13, 2013

MR. PRESIDENT, DON'T APPEASE THE BULLIES

[N. B. Ironically, President Obama's website says that, because of the shutdown, his office may not see this letter I sent today until it is over. Thanks to the invaluable Nancy for her editing help.]
 
Dear President Obama:
 
I’m 74 years old, a Democrat since college when I campaigned for Adlai Stevenson; I’ve been a loyal supporter of President Obama, Senators Levin and Stabenow, and Representative Dingell. Although I depend on social security and Medicare I’m also a patriot, as my immigrant father taught me. As much as the government shutdown may hurt me, the imminent danger to the nation that I hope my grandchildren will inherit with pride, will hurt me more.

The passive aggression of the smug, do-nothing anarchists of the far right must be resisted at all costs. To me, this means that you must not give them anything in return for modifying or even dropping their extortionate demands. To do otherwise, would be to invite an ongoing crisis by rewarding behavior that partakes of disloyalty and borders on treason.

Airplane, the 1980 film comedy, has a satire on Point Counterpoint in which the conservative says of the trapped plane passengers, “They bought their tickets, they knew what they were getting into, let ‘em die!” Thus, yesterday’s satire is today’s doctrine. Food inspection, medical research, aid to the hungry, Medicare, Medicaid, and many other services that have an impact on health either have been or will be interrupted or just lost if the “Let ‘em die!” faction isn’t stopped now.

Please, I beg you, no matter the short-term cost, stand your ground to save our democracy.